Killer Critics from Cyberspace… and Beyond the Infinite!

In early 2012, I posted on, what has become, a controversial document. C3: the Canonized Cardinal Continuum. It’s a modified version of an essay I wrote as an undergraduate, while studying logic and the development of the calculus, as part of a special projects course I took while getting my Bachelor’s Degree in Philosophy. It didn’t take long to draw unwanted attention. Little did I know that this was academic heresy worthy of being ostracized.

Acceleration – Temporal Iteration – An Introduction to Temporal Mechanics

Acceleration – Temporal Iteration – An Introduction to Temporal Mechanics

Temporal dynamics can be applied to the concepts of mass, acceleration, and force redefining these concepts in terms of temporal composition. From these new insights into basic physics can gravity be better understood?

Assuming mass, classically, to be a negative volume of time, or a negative temporal scalar (3D-time), can peculiar phenomena related to the measurement time, such as acceleration and deceleration, be accounted for using these new definitions?

The Higgs Paradox

It appears that a new level of strange quantum behavior is at hand. Entangled data between CMS and ATLAS, the two detectors at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), suggest a paradox: are we dealing with one Higgs-like particle or two?! The July 4th 2012 data released by CERN concerning the newly discovered particle as a candidate for the theoretical Higgs Boson reveals a bizarre anomaly in the data. It just so happens that this exact anomaly confirms another prediction made by Wince concerning his application of Existics equations to physics.

Final Neutrino Results Confirm Problems with Calculations

On June 2, 2012, Gavin Wince uploaded a video covering his presentation on April 17, 2012, where he predicted that the final results concerning the neutrino time-of-flight data would ultimately reveal problems in the theory of Relativity.

WINCE vs CERN: One Round Only!

On June 8, 2012, CERN released its official final results claiming that the apparent superluminal speed of neutrinos was due to experimental error. Though the neutrino time-of-flight (TOF) was not quit 60 nano-seconds faster than light, the neutrinos on average appeared to travel 6 nano-seconds faster than light. “Contemporary physicists accept this ‘speed’ as consistent with theory,” says Wince, “but I beleive their acceptance is flimsy”. Wince points out that according to theoretical physics, neutrinos have mass. Therefore, not only are neutrinos forbidden from traveling faster than light, they are equally forbidden from traveling light speed. What CERN, MINOS, and the physics community at large states is that the data fits theory within statistical error. This is not a satisfactory answer for Wince as he predicted such an event would eventual occur revealing an inherent flaw within the mathematics used in Special Relativity. According to Wince, his correction for this problem easily accounts for the apparent extra 6 nano-seconds. Though this maybe an extremely subtle point easily considered negligible and “within statistical error”, Wince offers a mathematical modification to Relativity that has applications to this and other anomalies in physics.

WINCE vs CERN: an Encore Presentation

Wince Predictions CONFIRMED!!!

On July 2, 2012, Gavin Wince discussed predictions he made regarding new data on the elusive Higgs particle. In anticipation of CERN’s July 4th announcement, Gavin Wince explains why he did not believe any new significant data in support of the Higgs particle would emerge. He briefly offered alternatives to the Higgs particle and/or Higgs Mechanism for resolving the issue surround the concept of mass.


Neutrino Fiasco Intellectual Dodge

Physicists Fumble Fractured Theory while Philosopher Finds Fix– Extra Dimensions of Time Frame Experimental Anomalies within Stand Model.

PR Log (Press Release) – Apr 13, 2012 – One of the cornerstones to Einstein’s Theory of Relativity comes undone next Tuesday according to Philosopher Gavin Wince. “Physicists have crossed the line; asymptotically speaking of course”, he says. The controversy surrounding the apparent superluminal neutrinos may have been a verification of Wince’s mathematical fix to the problem now that “physics experiments have finally caught up to the predictions of Existics”, Wince says. “The subject of my dissertation became headline news before I could get a change to enroll into a doctoral program!”
As an undergraduate student at both UC Davis and CSU Sacramento (CSUS) in the 1990’s Wince found problems with the mathematics used in modern physics and developed his discovery into a mathematical formalization he calls Existics.
While enrolled in a Master’s degree program at the University of Philosophical Research (UPR) in Los Angeles, California, Wince furthered developed Existics with faculty member Physicist Harold Dean Brown who was one of the eleven creators of the Z80 microchip. Applying the Existics equations to the Theory of Relativity and prior to Brown’s death in 2003, Wince wrote an essay title, “the Adjusted Twin Paradox”, predicting eventual failures of Special Relativity.
In September of 2011, while Physicists around the world struggled to deal with experimental results showing neutrinos apparently traveling faster than light, predictions made in “The Adjusted Twin Paradox” essay appeared to be showing up in the data from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), specifically the measured time-of-flight of neutrinos from the LHC in Switzerland/France to the Gran Sasso laboratory in Italy. Wince predicted that near the edges of our understanding of Relativity our mathematics fails. “Not because Einstein was wrong about E=mc^2, but because Newton was wrong about absolute space AND universal time. Reference frames must be redefined even further”, says Wince with a rascally grin. “You see, we are using 300-year-old Calculus that was created using old assumptions, many of which we now know are incorrect with better mathematical replacements”, Wince says.
Technically speaking, by modifying what is used conventionally in Relativity, such as the Minkowski Diagram with 3D-Time, much of the unexplained data in modern physics experiments can be accounted for. In other words, time is better understood through three dimensions upgrading traditionally physics. Videos and written material about Existics can be found at:
Gavin Wince will be performing a never-before-seen calculation of how the Existics equations, when applied as a calibration to the Lorentz Transformation and other traditional equations of Relativity, account for both the ICARUS and OPERA experimental result.
Press Conference/Media Event will be held at:
10:30am-11:00am & 11:30am-12:00pm
500 S. Sepulveda Blvd., 1st Floor
Los Angeles, CA  90049
Store: 310.471.9330

Limited Attendance: press, media, students, teachers, professional academics. BRING CREDENTIALS or STUDENT/FACULTY SCHOOL IDENTIFICATION. Please RSVP. Email For all other appointments call: (760) 774-2379



Morning Breakthrough

This mornings news:
I successfully worked out the application of the Existics transformation to account for both super-luminal and sub-luminal measurements of the neutrino. In the process I also derived the Lorentz Transformation from the Existics’
Kronecker Delta. Have a look: three dimensions of time vs one dimension of time is paying of nicely.