Comments for existics

Comment on The Evolution of Time (Director’s Cut) by gavinwince

gavinwince — Sat, 08 Nov 2014 01:39:23 +0000

All ways open to discussion. The best place to chat with me is either on twitter or the comment section of my YouTube channel. I have to filter through a lot of spam to find real messages such as yours… hence why the response took so long. Plus I rarely check my email these days. Hit me up on YouTube or Twitter

Comment on Gavin Wince by gavinwince

gavinwince — Sat, 08 Nov 2014 01:36:41 +0000

Thanks for the offer. I think it would be too complicated to have you help me with post production, especially given the fact that all I’m using is my iPhone for both the video and audio recordings. Maybe when I get some real equipment

Comment on Gavin Wince by sinewavz

sinewavz — Wed, 29 Oct 2014 01:57:42 +0000

Hi Gavin, Really like your work. It looks very elegant. I watched all your videos. I was not too sure what is the best way to contact you but I am an audio engineer and I would like to help with your videos by offering audio post production. Please get in touch. You can find my details in my profile. all the best.

Comment on The Evolution of Time (Director’s Cut) by Andrei Samoylov

Andrei Samoylov — Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:35:19 +0000

Very impressed. `Still absorbing` is a right thing to say.

I am wondering if you are open to discussions. Your theory is bright, and more than that, I am drawn here by the flexibility of your thinking.

I am doing a research to see if there are laws that govern `everything` (which I call contracts) as they get more and more complex.

Your 3D-time can be viewed as object’s past escaping from it, with the speed of light, of course. I’d love to converse, this is my email: as@andrique.ru.

Comment on Existics: 101 by gavinwince

gavinwince — Wed, 18 Jun 2014 23:08:30 +0000

Yes, and I would place them in the category of “subjective”.

Comment on Existics: 101 by gavinwince

gavinwince — Wed, 18 Jun 2014 23:07:42 +0000

Have you seen the video “The Dark Side of Time”? It covers this issue in depth

Comment on existics: 101 by gavinwince

gavinwince — Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:57:20 +0000

Hopefully by the end of 2014 I will have a formal publication of the material presented in these videos.

Comment on Wince vs Susskind: Round One by gavinwince

gavinwince — Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:55:11 +0000

General Relativity has four dimensions: three spatial and one temporal

Comment on Wince vs Susskind: Round One by rritoch

rritoch — Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:09:57 +0000

How many dimensions does General Relativity Imply? I made the mistake of asking this question in a physics forum and of course I was banned for it. Regardless, I have reason to believe that it may be possible to measure t_2 by measuring the red-shift between two objects with no relative momentum. This of course implies that the universe isn’t expanding and is enough to get the current physics community to convict me of witchcraft and burn me to a stake. Either way, this question comes down to a more simple question. If a formula exists that requires a certain number of dimensions, how many free dimensions are required for that physics to exist? Gravity formula’s imply 2 spatial dimensions, yet we know this leaves at least 1 free dimension. Einstein’s GR equation implies 4 spatial dimensions and 4 time dimensions with it’s /c^4 term, so is it safe to conclude that there are 10 dimensions total? This seems to be compatible with some versions of string theory, but I see little evidence for an extra 2 spatial dimensions, and less evidence of an extra 3 time dimensions (if this red-shift theory could be proven). I know your time is valuable but I would greatly appreciate any direction you could provide as the current physics community doesn’t seem to be interested in solving the remaining physics problems. What I am looking for is a physics community that is honestly looking for answers instead of looking for validation.

Comment on existics: 101 by bspasov

bspasov — Fri, 30 May 2014 00:29:13 +0000

Hi Gavin,
I am wondering if there exist somewhere publication about your discoveries?
I would be thankfull to get something more formal to read.
Regards, Boris spasov.