https://existics101.com/?p=151 "The study of the laws that govern existence." Sat, 08 Nov 2014 01:39:23 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38 https://existics101.com/?p=151#comment-175 Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:55:11 +0000 http://existics101.com/?p=151#comment-175 General Relativity has four dimensions: three spatial and one temporal

]]> https://existics101.com/?p=151#comment-173 Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:09:57 +0000 http://existics101.com/?p=151#comment-173 How many dimensions does General Relativity Imply? I made the mistake of asking this question in a physics forum and of course I was banned for it. Regardless, I have reason to believe that it may be possible to measure t_2 by measuring the red-shift between two objects with no relative momentum. This of course implies that the universe isn’t expanding and is enough to get the current physics community to convict me of witchcraft and burn me to a stake. Either way, this question comes down to a more simple question. If a formula exists that requires a certain number of dimensions, how many free dimensions are required for that physics to exist? Gravity formula’s imply 2 spatial dimensions, yet we know this leaves at least 1 free dimension. Einstein’s GR equation implies 4 spatial dimensions and 4 time dimensions with it’s /c^4 term, so is it safe to conclude that there are 10 dimensions total? This seems to be compatible with some versions of string theory, but I see little evidence for an extra 2 spatial dimensions, and less evidence of an extra 3 time dimensions (if this red-shift theory could be proven). I know your time is valuable but I would greatly appreciate any direction you could provide as the current physics community doesn’t seem to be interested in solving the remaining physics problems. What I am looking for is a physics community that is honestly looking for answers instead of looking for validation.

]]>