Comments on: Existics: 101

By: gavinwince

gavinwince — Wed, 18 Jun 2014 23:08:30 +0000

Yes, and I would place them in the category of “subjective”.

By: gavinwince

gavinwince — Wed, 18 Jun 2014 23:07:42 +0000

Have you seen the video “The Dark Side of Time”? It covers this issue in depth

By: MPIAT

MPIAT — Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:17:29 +0000

Hi,

I have taken part of the theory of multidimensional time and tired light model which is interesting.
Nevertheless I wonder what your idea to explain blueshift works?
Is the tired light (redshift) overlaying the “real” movement of galaxys?

By: rjday753

rjday753 — Sat, 25 Jan 2014 20:20:51 +0000

Seems you should de-interlace the source video first and make sure there are more key frames. That should clear it up.

By: jason

jason — Wed, 15 Jan 2014 02:16:52 +0000

do you consider thoughts existence?

By: gavinwince

gavinwince — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:59:31 +0000

Thank you for the comment/correction. You’re right. I meant for that to be a negative (does not exist) & double negative (nor does it not); but I now realize I didn’t quite do that right. I meant for it to say that it does not exist nor is it nonexistent either.

By: existicshp

existicshp — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:40:50 +0000

In Existics: 101
II. Preface
it is stated: … neither existent nor nonexistent …

A few lines further it reads:
Therefore, ‘it’ does not exist, nor does ‘it’ not exist either.

Maybe it meant:
Therefore, ‘it’ does not exist, nor does ‘it’ exist either. ?
http://existics101.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Existics101-01-13-20121.pdf

By: gavinwince

gavinwince — Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:00:44 +0000

It ain’t easy being green…
http://youtu.be/mIcffgtzs14