An Introduction to Existics
- Introduction
- Preface
- Postulates of Existics
- Axiomatization of the Postulates of Existics
- Interaction: Basis for Existence
- Relative Frames of Reference
- Reference Frame Schemata
- Invariance through Identity
- Existics Equations (Basic)
- Intermediary Frames of Reference
It ain’t easy being green…
http://youtu.be/mIcffgtzs14
Seems you should de-interlace the source video first and make sure there are more key frames. That should clear it up.
In Existics: 101
II. Preface
it is stated: … neither existent nor nonexistent …
A few lines further it reads:
Therefore, ‘it’ does not exist, nor does ‘it’ not exist either.
Maybe it meant:
Therefore, ‘it’ does not exist, nor does ‘it’ exist either. ?
http://existics101.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Existics101-01-13-20121.pdf
Thank you for the comment/correction. You’re right. I meant for that to be a negative (does not exist) & double negative (nor does it not); but I now realize I didn’t quite do that right. I meant for it to say that it does not exist nor is it nonexistent either.
do you consider thoughts existence?
Yes, and I would place them in the category of “subjective”.
Hi,
I have taken part of the theory of multidimensional time and tired light model which is interesting.
Nevertheless I wonder what your idea to explain blueshift works?
Is the tired light (redshift) overlaying the “real” movement of galaxys?
Have you seen the video “The Dark Side of Time”? It covers this issue in depth