Is space-time fragmented, segmented into quantized bits of information, or causal sets?

Or is space-time smooth and continuous, with curves, bends, and warps; just as Einstein had predicted?

Is what we call space-time even part of objective reality or is it just a mathematical construct that appeals to our perceptions?

The answer could be all of the above depending on our frame of reference. When we apply Temporal Mechanics to Physics, it appears that there are underlying aspects to Relativity that subtly show up in Quantum Mechanics as extra dimensions of time.

Obsolete points-of-view regarding the nature of time and relative frames of reference may be at the center of the mismatch between Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity.

Most physics theories tend to have a unique premise in common: one time dimension. In fact, there is a growing consensus that time is just an illusion.

Yet, applying extra dimensions to time can successfully modify modern physics without violating the conservation laws long held to be true. Modern notions of quantum gravity and curved space-time can successfully be replaced with an infinitude of relative frames of reference, progressing and regressing though infinite series of relations, which imply the existence of multidimensional time.

existics101.com

Can we get a better understanding of what gravity is, assuming mass is a composite of time, as suggested? And, in doing so, can we gain some insight into possible deficiencies in the theory of General Relativity?

The bizarre phenomena of the quantum world, “action at a distance”, can account for the mechanism of gravity, when the Inclusion Principle is included within the definition of Quantum Entanglement.

Acceleration – Temporal Iteration – An Introduction to Temporal Mechanics

Temporal dynamics can be applied to the concepts of mass, acceleration, and force redefining these concepts in terms of temporal composition. From these new insights into basic physics can gravity be better understood?

Assuming mass, classically, to be a negative volume of time, or a negative temporal scalar (3D-time), can peculiar phenomena related to the measurement time, such as acceleration and deceleration, be accounted for using these new definitions?

May the Black Hole Wars Resume!

The Information Paradox is back; stronger than ever! But this time, with teeth!
Information isn’t disappearing, it’s changing histories over time!

Symmetry can change into other symmetrical forms; asymmetry can change into other asymmetrical forms, but symmetry and asymmetry cannot merge into being the same thing without introducing something into the system. In our case, that would be a New physics.

As it stands, super symmetry and string theory are on shaky ground, and the potential for Existics to surpass these great theories, as a working theory of everything, is at hand.

A Brief look into the history of the development of the concepts of Space, Time and how they relate to Mass. Starting in 1715 working up into today, we move from conventional into unconventional examining multidimensional time and its possible relationship with mass.

This philosophy video attempts to answer the age old question:

“What is mass?!”

Could mass simply be a composition of time? Is mass composed of temporal coordinates?